Friday, March 23, 2012

Cultural Diversity in America


Cultural Diversity in America

Journal article, Liberating History: The Context of the Challenge of Psychologists of Color to American Psychology, “examines the history of race and ethnicity in the United States, and how it played out in the field of psychology” (Pickren, 2009).  His research pinpoints events throughout American history with emphasis on the post-World War II era.  In his opinion, reviewing and understanding the transgressions of the oppressed in America will enable American psychologists to relate to indigenous individuals surfacing internationally.  As the world globalizes, it is imperative that Americans comprehend and continue to connect to varying and developing cultures.
            Taken into account are the periods of slavery to reconstruction, the Civil Rights movement, Black Nationalist movement, Black consciousness, the Feminist movement, and the arrival of increasing numbers of immigrants from Asia, Central, and South America.  To begin with, during the period of colonialism, the “goal of imperial rule was to diminish and even destroy the world view and ways of life of the colonized people” (Pickren, 2009).  Non-Europeans were considered savage and archaic.  In northern states, various national groups were in conflict: i.e. Slavs opposed to Irish, English opposed to French.  However, southerners were divided among ethnicities and racial divergence; i.e. Whites or Caucasian Americans versus Africans and Black Americans.  Once slavery was eradicated, living conditions for Blacks worsened and Jim Crow was established to perpetuate and justify segregation.  Various scientists, religious, and political leaders supported these concepts and beliefs.  However, “after World War II a new environment developed and new voices emerged that were clearly defiant of the old psychological colonialism and helped create a positive emphasis on identity grounded in the lived experiences of racial and ethnic minority psychologists” (Pickren, 2009).  The Civil Rights movement paralleled the international struggle to abolish colonialism and imperialism.  In addition, as American society began to integrate, “prominent movements against the Vietnam War, a burgeoning women’s movement as part of the second wave of feminism, and an emergent student and youth movement” (Pickren, 2009) were simultaneously occurring.  From the 1960s to present day, immigrants have continued to assimilate into American society particularly from Asia, Central, and South America.  With this influx, additional socio-economic issues have arisen.  As a result, America’s multicultural society has caused psychologists and practitioners to develop a new psychology “that is more than, though inclusive of, Eurocentric psychology. A psychology developed from the intellectual and social resources of multiple cultures will enrich theory, methods, and practices beyond what is available in the Eurocentric or America-centric traditions alone” (Pickren, 2009).  A culturally diverse basis will enable psychologists to more effectively relate, connect, and administer treatment to an international community within America and abroad.
            This article addresses and supports current diversity issues.  In effort to progress, one has to consider the causes which influenced the present circumstances.  Cultural issues throughout American history have shaped the opinions, beliefs, prejudices, and discriminations of various ethnicities across the nation.  “Throughout history, people of many cultures have demonstrated an ethnocentric view of the world” (Parrillo, 2009, p. 16).  This concept has manifested within American society as well.  In addition, even though integration was implemented over forty years ago, certain groups and individuals continue to socially segregate.  Therefore, it is vital that the masses intermingle and continue to learn, share, and accept one another.  In effort to effectively address issues affecting educational, criminal, social, and economic systems, it is critical for professionals, politicians, law enforcement, educators, community activists, and common citizens to incorporate diversity consciousness into their lives.  Pickren’s article focuses on how emerging social disparities may be resolved on a global level, by understanding and applying cultural and cross-cultural psychology.  This will “reveal similarities and commonalities of struggle and identity formation among psychologists from Third World countries and racial and ethnic minority psychologists in the United States” (Pickren, 2009).  Conflict and diversity barriers are inevitable components of any society.  However, disputes, discrimination, prejudice, stereotypes, ethnocentrism, and limited perceptions must be appropriately addressed in order to overcome them (Bucher, 2010).  In effort to assist those afflicted with these issues, practitioners must consider all cultures in relation to one another, their histories, traditions, and customs.  In doing so, oppressed individuals may begin to triumph over personal and social barriers and establish effective communication with their oppressor or dominant culture as they assimilate and co-exist.       

References:
Bucher, R. (2010). Diversity consciousness: Opening our minds to people, cultures, and
opportunities (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Parillo, V. (2009). Strangers to these shores: Race and ethnic relations in the United
States (9th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Pickren, W.E. (2009). Liberating History: The Context of the Challenge of Psychologists
of Color to American Psychology. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 15 (4), 425-433. Retrieved February 7, 2011, from

Thursday, March 22, 2012

Global Mediation



 Global Mediation

          As the international community matures, global mediation has increasingly served as a necessary means for conflict resolution among disputants.  As a result several organizations specializing in the field have formed throughout the world.  Of these companies, the following will be analyzed; Global Mediation Service, International Mediation Institute (IMI), and Global Mediation Services Ltd. (GMS).  This examination will focus on organizational theme commonalities in their services and approach to understanding cultural differences and any variance which may exist in relation to the native country of the company.
            To begin with, the mission of Global Mediation Service is to prevent business failure which is typically a result of disputes and conflict.  Their goal is to resolve these issues in a time and cost efficient manner.  Although their company is based in Los Angeles, their offices have expanded throughout the United States including New York, Chicago, Dallas, and Miami.  Their services consist of but are not limited to; mediation, arbitration, negotiation, contractual disputes, border and boundary disputes, debt collection, international commercial disputes, customer warranty disputes, corporate shareholder disputes, and conciliation, and extend across the U.S. to China.  The Global Mediation Service “approach to dispute resolution begins with the premise that disputes cost money and detract from a businesses resources and its ability to make money” (Global Mediation Service, 2006).  They believe that a lack of information and clarity concerning objectives and interests are often the cause of these issues.  Therefore, they assist their clients by explaining these factors and creating a bilateral understanding.
            Next, the International Mediation Institute (IMI) “is a non-profit foundation and registered charity established in 2007 as a global public service initiative to drive transparency and high competency standards into mediation practice across all fields, worldwide” (IMI Mediation, 2010).  This company is based on the internet, operating internationally, but is based in The Hague, The Netherlands. (The Hague is the City of International Peace, Justice, Reconciliation, and Security and exemplifies neutrality).  Their mission is to globally promote and elucidate the art of mediation throughout various fields inclusive of obligatory information, essential materials, appropriate training, and feedback from their clientele.  IMI attempts to enable disputants to turn win-lose scenarios into mutual gain, litigation to negotiation, and risks into opportunities.  They utilize methods of mediation and negotiation to resolve disputes and encourage international peace.
            Then, there is the Global Mediation Services Ltd. (GMS) based in Hong Kong.  This organization “was formed in 1999 to develop and expand the ADR and mediator training business of Commercial, Mediation & Arbitration Services Ltd (CMA)” (Global Mediation, 2010).  They offer training courses which range from one-day mediation or ADR familiarization courses, to five-day mediator training courses in which professionals seek accreditation based on the standards required by international associations.  These training courses: 
-          provide a high level of interactive participation by role-play training techniques and group debriefing
-          teach theoretical and practical mediation skills and ADR techniques
-          provide a high faculty/student ratio by the use of experienced co-trainers and coaches
-          are tailored to the individual and/or cultural needs and background of the participants and/or needs of sponsoring bodies
-          are developed and modified in the light of participant feedback
(Global Mediation, 2010).
The co-trainers and coaches hail from foreign jurisdictions or countries providing their clientele with intercontinental specialist knowledge and expertise in ADR and mediation processes.
            Now what these organizations share in their approach to understanding differing cultural patterns is consideration of the background of the disputants and maintaining and utilizing a staff which is trained and experienced in international business, mediation, law, or consulting.  What varies in their approaches, are their initial focus which reflects the core of their individual organization.  This is based in the origin of the company.  The Global Mediation Service, based in the United States, is primarily concerned with resolving conflict in effort to improve or protect their clients’ financial interests.  This is synonymous with the American society which tends to perceive money as an indicator of success, status, power, and importance.  The International Mediation Institute, founded in The Netherlands, centers on peace and conflict avoidance which mirrors their diplomatic, serene, accepting, and accommodating culture.  Then the Global Mediation Services Ltd., based in Hong Kong, utilizes team and teacher-to-student approaches in order to assist their clientele.  This is reflective of their society as well.
            In closing, mediation companies are an increasing necessity in international affairs in effort to resolve the inevitable conflicts which will occur among disputants.  Although these organizations’ approaches to varying cultural patterns may differ in some instances based on the origin on the company, their personnel is skilled in international etiquette, practices, and awareness.  These factors are vital to their success and essential to effective global mediation.

References:
Global Mediation Service. Retrieved November 29, 2010, from
 Global Mediation Services Ltd. Retrieved November 29, 2010, from
 International Mediation Institute. Retrieved November 29, 2010, from
http://www.imimediation.org/.