Sunday, July 29, 2012

Causes of Abnormal Behaviors


 Causes of Abnormal Behaviors
            Globally, people suffer from abnormal behaviors such as delirium, depression, anxiety, sexual, eating, sleeping, impulse control, or personality disorders.  In my humble opinion, diathesis-stress hypothesis combined with sociocultural factors are the foremost causes of such abnormal behaviors.  The diathesis-stress premise provides a genetic influence of certain psychological disorders.  When considered in conjunction with environmental stressors, various impairments are more prone to occur (American Psychological Association, 2012).  Thus, a history of psychological disorders within an individual’s family in concurrence with environmental risk factors increases the likelihood of the individual being susceptible to similar illness (Prevention Action, 2012).  Furthermore, the stress component of this model is comparable to the sociocultural factors which foster abnormal behaviors.  Various dynamics such as racism, poverty, unemployment, ethnicity, gender, conflicting social roles, religious belief, social change, or uncertainty may promote the occurrence of abnormal behavior in an individual.  Hence, genetics, environment, and sociocultural existence conclusively encompass the causal forces which foster the probability of their vulnerability to abnormal behavior.  These considerations explicate the means of contracting such mental illnesses in a consummate regard.  In short, heredity, habitat, and lifestyle constitute the means in which people contract sickness and disorders.

References:
American Psychological Association. (2012). Diathesis-stress hypothesis. Retrieved from
            http://www.apa.org/research/action/glossary.aspx.
Prevention Action. (2012). Diathesis-stress models. Retrieved from
            http://www.preventionaction.org/reference/diathesis-stress-m

Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Cultural Diversity: client vs organizational interests



Cultural Diversity: client vs organizational interests
            At times an organization’s policies may conflict with a particular client’s best interest, due to cultural differences.  Situations as such require the practitioner to choose between principle ethics and virtue ethics, causing them to consider justice, autonomy, beneficence, and fairness along with professional ethical standards and codes (Corey, Corey, & Callanan, 2011).  A couple examples of these scenarios are as follows:
  1. Within your client’s culture, it is customary to invite leaders, counselors, and elders into the home for dinner, fellowship, and blessings within the preliminary stages of the relationship or process.  Failure to accept the invitation is considered offensive and may impede establishing rapport.  However, the practitioner’s organizational policy clearly states that each meeting or face-to-face client-clinician interaction must take place exclusively on company premises.
  2. As a student advisor at a high school Christian academy, a senior class student whom you have been advising since her freshman year becomes impregnated and desires to have an immediate abortion.  Although the school offers assistance, programs, and advising to students and families affected by teen pregnancy, they do not advocate pro-choice.  However this particular young lady is an honor-roll student athlete anticipating playing division one athletics in college next fall on full scholarship.
Both scenarios require the practitioner to consider their client’s interest versus organizational policy.  Yet choosing to support or cater to the client’s need directly causes them to abort the company’s or school’s code of ethics.  However, these types of situations may present themselves throughout the practitioner’s professional career.  Therefore the practitioner must regard these issues and act accordingly on a case-by-case basis.  In addition, it should be duly noted that an organization operating through the lens of cultural tunnel vision is bound to conflict with varying attitudes, customs, and beliefs of a culturally diverse society (Corey et al., 2011).

References:
Corey, G., Corey, M. S., & Callanan, P. (2011) Issues and ethics in the helping
professions (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole.